http://www.gazettetimes.com/articles/2004/10/10/news/the_west/west02.txt

National forest fees could be permanent

National forest fees could be permanent

By The Associated Press

BEND — Recreational fees required to use national forests and parks could become permanent if the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act is approved by Congress this month.

The fee program began in 1996 to ease the cost of operating and maintaining federal recreation sites.

Congress also stressed the fees would be used to improve quality.

The National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service collected $175.7 million during fiscal 2002, up from $172.8 million in 2001.

But while some money was redirected into local projects, data released by the four federal agencies also revealed that a substantial amount of the fees has remained unused each year.

The money has been accumulating year after year, reaching $295.8 million.

"We really do not want to build up a fund,'' said Rex Holloway, spokesman for the Forest Service office in Portland. "The money is used to maintain existing facilities that we currently have. We are needing these fees to maintain those facilities.''

In total, the Forest Service spent $45.3 million from the program to improve sites where the fees were collected in 2002.

There was still enough money left from earlier years to record a $19 million rollover into fiscal year 2003.

The accumulation of cash, however, does not necessarily mean the maintenance requirements at all fee sites are being met, according to a report by the U.S. General Accounting Office, or GAO.

Current legislation requires 80 percent of the fees collected at a certain site be used at that location.

In testimony before a House Resources committee, GAO officials said the requirement causes some sites to "generate revenue in excess of their high-priority needs'' while the same needs "at other sites, which do not collect as much in fee revenues, remained unmet.''

The GAO said the requirement "may inadvertently create funding imbalances between sites.''

Critics note the fee also was implemented to "enhance visitor experience.''

A National Park Service-supported report released in June 2003 by the Social Research Laboratory at Northern Arizona University showed the public to be generally supportive of the fees.

According to the survey of 3,515 households, 80 percent of visitors who paid to enter the National Park system said the amount was "just about right.''

But Scott Silver, executive director of Wild Wilderness in Bend, said the report is skewed.

"When they say that the demo fee program is popular,'' Silver said, "they are lying. The measure is intensely unpopular.''

Silver said 306 groups around the nation originally opposed the program while legislatures in three states — Oregon, California and Colorado — have passed resolutions opposing the recreational fees.

_____________________________________
Postings are made for informational and/or educational purposes only. They are not always issues Rockcrawler.Com and I support nor do they necessarily reflect our beliefs. They are distributed in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml